1998 Chevrolet Metro vs. 2009 Tata B-Line
To start off, 2009 Tata B-Line is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Chevrolet Metro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Chevrolet Metro would be higher. At 1,404 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Tata B-Line is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Chevrolet Metro (78 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2009 Tata B-Line. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Chevrolet Metro should accelerate faster than 2009 Tata B-Line.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Tata B-Line (110 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Chevrolet Metro. (102 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Tata B-Line will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Chevrolet Metro.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Chevrolet Metro | 2009 Tata B-Line | |
Make | Chevrolet | Tata |
Model | Metro | B-Line |
Year Released | 1998 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1294 cc | 1404 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 78 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 102 Nm | 110 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 3680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2410 mm |