1998 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1963 Ford Cortina
To start off, 1998 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Chevrolet Tracker (96 HP) has 47 more horse power than 1963 Ford Cortina. (49 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Because 1998 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Ford Cortina. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Cortina. (90 Nm). This means 1998 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Chevrolet Tracker | 1963 Ford Cortina | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Tracker | Cortina |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1198 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 49 HP |
| Torque | 139 Nm | 90 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2500 mm |
