1998 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1982 Dodge 600
To start off, 1998 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge 600 would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Dodge 600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 96 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 65 kg more than 1982 Dodge 600.
Because 1998 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Dodge 600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Dodge 600 (158 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1982 Dodge 600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Chevrolet Tracker | 1982 Dodge 600 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Dodge |
Model | Tracker | 600 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 2212 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1165 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2630 mm |