1998 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2002 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2002 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 2,351 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1998 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Mitsubishi Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Chevrolet Tracker | 2002 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
Model | Tracker | Colt |
Year Released | 1998 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 2351 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |