1998 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2005 Mazda 2

To start off, 2005 Mazda 2 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 1,594 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda 2 (99 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1998 Chevrolet Tracker. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1998 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 200 kg more than 2005 Mazda 2.

Because 1998 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Mazda 2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda 2 (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2005 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Chevrolet Tracker.

Compare all specifications:

1998 Chevrolet Tracker 2005 Mazda 2
Make Chevrolet Mazda
Model Tracker 2
Year Released 1998 2005
Body Type SUV Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1588 cc 1594 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 96 HP 99 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 139 Nm 146 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type 4WD Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1230 kg 1030 kg
Vehicle Length 3860 mm 3930 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1700 mm 1550 mm
Wheelbase Size 2210 mm 2500 mm