1998 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2008 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2008 Ford Ecosport is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Chevrolet Tracker (96 HP) has 29 more horse power than 2008 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 2008 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1998 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Ford Ecosport. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Chevrolet Tracker | 2008 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Tracker | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2008 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2490 mm |
