1998 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2012 Peugeot RCZ
To start off, 2012 Peugeot RCZ is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Peugeot RCZ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Peugeot RCZ (156 HP) has 60 more horse power than 1998 Chevrolet Tracker. (96 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot RCZ should accelerate faster than 1998 Chevrolet Tracker.
Because 1998 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Peugeot RCZ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Peugeot RCZ has automatic transmission and 1998 Chevrolet Tracker has manual transmission. 1998 Chevrolet Tracker will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Peugeot RCZ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Chevrolet Tracker | 2012 Peugeot RCZ | |
Make | Chevrolet | Peugeot |
Model | Tracker | RCZ |
Year Released | 1998 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 156 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4287 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1845 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1359 mm |