1998 Chrysler Chronos vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 1998 Chrysler Chronos is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (10 cylinders), 1998 Chrysler Chronos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Chrysler Chronos (350 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 283 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Chrysler Chronos should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102.
Because 1998 Chrysler Chronos is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Chrysler Chronos. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 102, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1998 Chrysler Chronos has automatic transmission and 1981 Zastava 102 has manual transmission. 1981 Zastava 102 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Chrysler Chronos will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Chrysler Chronos | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Zastava |
| Model | Chronos | 102 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 6000 cc | 1302 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2160 mm |
