1998 Chrysler Chronos vs. 1982 Toyota Camry
To start off, 1998 Chrysler Chronos is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Camry. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Camry would be higher. At 6,000 cc (10 cylinders), 1998 Chrysler Chronos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Chrysler Chronos (350 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 244 more horse power than 1982 Toyota Camry. (106 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Chrysler Chronos should accelerate faster than 1982 Toyota Camry.
Because 1998 Chrysler Chronos is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Chrysler Chronos. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Toyota Camry, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Chrysler Chronos (311 Nm) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Toyota Camry. (166 Nm). This means 1998 Chrysler Chronos will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Toyota Camry.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Chrysler Chronos | 1982 Toyota Camry | |
Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
Model | Chronos | Camry |
Year Released | 1998 | 1982 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6000 cc | 1973 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 311 Nm | 166 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2610 mm |