1998 Chrysler Chronos vs. 1992 Holden Apollo
To start off, 1998 Chrysler Chronos is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Holden Apollo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Holden Apollo would be higher. At 6,000 cc (10 cylinders), 1998 Chrysler Chronos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Chrysler Chronos (350 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 232 more horse power than 1992 Holden Apollo. (118 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Chrysler Chronos should accelerate faster than 1992 Holden Apollo.
Because 1998 Chrysler Chronos is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Chrysler Chronos. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Holden Apollo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Chrysler Chronos (311 Nm) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Holden Apollo. (172 Nm). This means 1998 Chrysler Chronos will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Holden Apollo.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Chrysler Chronos | 1992 Holden Apollo | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | Chronos | Apollo |
Year Released | 1998 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6000 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 311 Nm | 172 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2610 mm |