1998 Chrysler Chronos vs. 1995 Reliant Scimitar
To start off, 1998 Chrysler Chronos is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Reliant Scimitar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Reliant Scimitar would be higher. At 6,000 cc (10 cylinders), 1998 Chrysler Chronos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Chrysler Chronos (350 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 246 more horse power than 1995 Reliant Scimitar. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Chrysler Chronos should accelerate faster than 1995 Reliant Scimitar.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Chrysler Chronos (311 Nm) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Reliant Scimitar. (127 Nm). This means 1998 Chrysler Chronos will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Reliant Scimitar.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Chrysler Chronos | 1995 Reliant Scimitar | |
Make | Chrysler | Reliant |
Model | Chronos | Scimitar |
Year Released | 1998 | 1995 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6000 cc | 1397 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 311 Nm | 127 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2140 mm |