1998 Chrysler Chronos vs. 1996 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1998 Chrysler Chronos is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 6,000 cc (10 cylinders), 1998 Chrysler Chronos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Chrysler Chronos (350 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 232 more horse power than 1996 Ford Ranger. (118 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Chrysler Chronos should accelerate faster than 1996 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Chrysler Chronos (311 Nm) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Ford Ranger. (198 Nm). This means 1998 Chrysler Chronos will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Chrysler Chronos | 1996 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | Chronos | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6000 cc | 2507 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 311 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2840 mm |
