1998 Chrysler Chronos vs. 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward
To start off, 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Chrysler Chronos. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Chrysler Chronos would be higher. At 6,000 cc (10 cylinders), 1998 Chrysler Chronos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Chrysler Chronos (350 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward. (322 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Chrysler Chronos should accelerate faster than 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward (499 Nm) has 188 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Chrysler Chronos. (311 Nm). This means 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Chrysler Chronos.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Chrysler Chronos | 2000 Rolls-Royce Park Ward | |
Make | Chrysler | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Chronos | Park Ward |
Year Released | 1998 | 2000 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6000 cc | 5379 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 322 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 311 Nm | 499 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 5650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 3360 mm |