1998 Chrysler Chronos vs. 2005 Audi TT
To start off, 2005 Audi TT is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Chrysler Chronos. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Chrysler Chronos would be higher. At 6,000 cc (10 cylinders), 1998 Chrysler Chronos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Chrysler Chronos (350 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 202 more horse power than 2005 Audi TT. (148 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Chrysler Chronos should accelerate faster than 2005 Audi TT.
Because 1998 Chrysler Chronos is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Chrysler Chronos. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Chrysler Chronos (311 Nm) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Audi TT. (210 Nm). This means 1998 Chrysler Chronos will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Chrysler Chronos | 2005 Audi TT | |
Make | Chrysler | Audi |
Model | Chronos | TT |
Year Released | 1998 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6000 cc | 1781 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 311 Nm | 210 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2430 mm |