1998 Chrysler Chronos vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Chrysler Chronos. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Chrysler Chronos would be higher. At 6,000 cc (10 cylinders), 1998 Chrysler Chronos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Chrysler Chronos (350 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 2010 Ford E-350. (177 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Chrysler Chronos should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford E-350.
Because 1998 Chrysler Chronos is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Chrysler Chronos. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Chrysler Chronos (311 Nm) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-350. (184 Nm). This means 1998 Chrysler Chronos will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Chrysler Chronos | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | Chronos | E-350 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6000 cc | 5400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 177 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 311 Nm | 184 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
| Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4437 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1806 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2619 mm |
