1998 Chrysler Concorde vs. 1955 Riley RM A
To start off, 1998 Chrysler Concorde is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,734 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Chrysler Concorde is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Chrysler Concorde weights approximately 339 kg more than 1955 Riley RM A.
Because 1955 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Chrysler Concorde, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1998 Chrysler Concorde has automatic transmission and 1955 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1955 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Chrysler Concorde will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Chrysler Concorde | 1955 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Chrysler | Riley |
| Model | Concorde | RM A |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1955 |
| Engine Size | 2734 cc | 1496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1236 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2870 mm |
