1998 Chrysler Concorde vs. 1963 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1998 Chrysler Concorde is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,734 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Chrysler Concorde is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Chrysler Concorde (190 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Chrysler Concorde should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Chrysler Concorde weights approximately 490 kg more than 1963 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Chrysler Concorde (255 Nm @ 4850 RPM) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1998 Chrysler Concorde will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Chrysler Concorde | 1963 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
Model | Concorde | Cedric |
Year Released | 1998 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2734 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 255 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4850 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2540 mm |