1998 Chrysler Concorde vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1998 Chrysler Concorde is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,734 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Chrysler Concorde is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Chrysler Concorde (190 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Chrysler Concorde should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Chrysler Concorde weights approximately 405 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Chrysler Concorde (255 Nm @ 4850 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1998 Chrysler Concorde will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Chrysler Concorde | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Chrysler | Triumph |
Model | Concorde | 2000 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2734 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 255 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4850 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78.5 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 64 L |