1998 Chrysler Concorde vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 1998 Chrysler Concorde is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Chrysler Concorde is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Chrysler Concorde (234 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 187 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Chrysler Concorde should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Chrysler Concorde weights approximately 783 kg more than 1980 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Chrysler Concorde, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Chrysler Concorde | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
| Model | Concorde | 66 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3518 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 234 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1605 kg | 822 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1390 mm |
