1998 Chrysler Concorde vs. 1982 Renault 9
To start off, 1998 Chrysler Concorde is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Renault 9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Renault 9 would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Chrysler Concorde is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Chrysler Concorde (234 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 187 more horse power than 1982 Renault 9. (47 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Chrysler Concorde should accelerate faster than 1982 Renault 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Chrysler Concorde weights approximately 783 kg more than 1982 Renault 9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Chrysler Concorde | 1982 Renault 9 | |
Make | Chrysler | Renault |
Model | Concorde | 9 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3518 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 234 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 9.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1605 kg | 822 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 38 L |