1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1964 Ferrari GTO
To start off, 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ferrari GTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ferrari GTO would be higher. At 2,953 cc (12 cylinders), 1964 Ferrari GTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Ferrari GTO (301 HP @ 7700 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (148 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Ferrari GTO should accelerate faster than 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 827 kg more than 1964 Ferrari GTO.
Because 1964 Ferrari GTO is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Ferrari GTO. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Ferrari GTO (255 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (227 Nm). This means 1964 Ferrari GTO will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 1964 Ferrari GTO | |
Make | Chrysler | Ferrari |
Model | Grand Voyager | GTO |
Year Released | 1998 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2428 cc | 2953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 301 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 7700 RPM |
Torque | 227 Nm | 255 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 58.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 878 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2410 mm |