1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2002 Renault Clio

To start off, 2002 Renault Clio is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Renault Clio (252 HP @ 7150 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (148 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 295 kg more than 2002 Renault Clio.

Because 2002 Renault Clio is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Renault Clio. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Renault Clio (300 Nm @ 4650 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (227 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 2002 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager.

Compare all specifications:

1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager 2002 Renault Clio
Make Chrysler Renault
Model Grand Voyager Clio
Year Released 1998 2002
Body Type Minivan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Middle
Engine Size 2428 cc 2946 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 148 HP 252 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 7150 RPM
Torque 227 Nm 300 Nm
Torque RPM 3900 RPM 4650 RPM
Engine Bore Size 87.5 mm 87 mm
Engine Stroke Size 101 mm 82.6 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.4:1 11.4:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1705 kg 1410 kg
Vehicle Length 5080 mm 3850 mm
Vehicle Width 1960 mm 1950 mm
Vehicle Height 1800 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 3040 mm 2480 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]