1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2004 Nissan Murano
To start off, 2004 Nissan Murano is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher. At 3,507 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Murano is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Murano (245 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (148 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Murano should accelerate faster than 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Murano weights approximately 91 kg more than 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Nissan Murano is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Murano will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Murano (328 Nm) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (227 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Murano will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2004 Nissan Murano | |
Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
Model | Grand Voyager | Murano |
Year Released | 1998 | 2004 |
Body Type | Minivan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2428 cc | 3507 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 227 Nm | 328 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 96.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 10.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 1796 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2810 mm |