1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2005 Isuzu Ascender
To start off, 2005 Isuzu Ascender is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Isuzu Ascender is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Isuzu Ascender (275 HP) has 127 more horse power than 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (148 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Isuzu Ascender should accelerate faster than 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Isuzu Ascender weights approximately 379 kg more than 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Isuzu Ascender is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Isuzu Ascender will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Isuzu Ascender (373 Nm) has 146 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (227 Nm). This means 2005 Isuzu Ascender will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2005 Isuzu Ascender | |
| Make | Chrysler | Isuzu |
| Model | Grand Voyager | Ascender |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2428 cc | 4195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 275 HP |
| Torque | 227 Nm | 373 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 93 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 102 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 2084 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2880 mm |
