1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2008 Volkswagen Eos
To start off, 2008 Volkswagen Eos is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher. At 2,428 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Volkswagen Eos (200 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (148 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Volkswagen Eos should accelerate faster than 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Volkswagen Eos (281 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (227 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 2008 Volkswagen Eos will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2008 Volkswagen Eos | |
Make | Chrysler | Volkswagen |
Model | Grand Voyager | Eos |
Year Released | 1998 | 2008 |
Body Type | Minivan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2428 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 227 Nm | 281 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2580 mm |