1998 Chrysler Neon vs. 1952 Ford Crestline
To start off, 1998 Chrysler Neon is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,929 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Chrysler Neon (131 HP @ 5850 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1952 Ford Crestline. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Chrysler Neon should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford Crestline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Ford Crestline weights approximately 371 kg more than 1998 Chrysler Neon.
Because 1952 Ford Crestline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Ford Crestline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Chrysler Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Chrysler Neon | 1952 Ford Crestline | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Neon | Crestline |
Year Released | 1998 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 3929 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5850 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1109 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2940 mm |