1998 Chrysler Neon vs. 1968 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1998 Chrysler Neon is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 7,010 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Mustang (335 HP) has 204 more horse power than 1998 Chrysler Neon. (131 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1998 Chrysler Neon.
Because 1968 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Chrysler Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Ford Mustang (597 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 423 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Chrysler Neon. (174 Nm @ 4950 RPM). This means 1968 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Chrysler Neon.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Chrysler Neon | 1968 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | Neon | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1968 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 7010 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 131 HP | 335 HP |
| Torque | 174 Nm | 597 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4950 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2750 mm |
