1998 Chrysler Neon vs. 1986 Nissan Pulsar

To start off, 1998 Chrysler Neon is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Chrysler Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Chrysler Neon (131 HP @ 5850 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1986 Nissan Pulsar. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Chrysler Neon should accelerate faster than 1986 Nissan Pulsar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Chrysler Neon weights approximately 244 kg more than 1986 Nissan Pulsar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Chrysler Neon (174 Nm @ 4950 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Nissan Pulsar. (96 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1998 Chrysler Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Nissan Pulsar.

Compare all specifications:

1998 Chrysler Neon 1986 Nissan Pulsar
Make Chrysler Nissan
Model Neon Pulsar
Year Released 1998 1986
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1996 cc 1270 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 131 HP 59 HP
Engine RPM 5850 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 174 Nm 96 Nm
Torque RPM 4950 RPM 3600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1109 kg 865 kg
Vehicle Length 4370 mm 3970 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1630 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2650 mm 2420 mm