1998 Chrysler Neon vs. 1992 Ford Tempo
To start off, 1998 Chrysler Neon is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Chrysler Neon (131 HP @ 5850 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1992 Ford Tempo. (129 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Chrysler Neon should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Ford Tempo weights approximately 86 kg more than 1998 Chrysler Neon.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Tempo (204 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Chrysler Neon. (174 Nm @ 4950 RPM). This means 1992 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Chrysler Neon.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Chrysler Neon | 1992 Ford Tempo | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Neon | Tempo |
Year Released | 1998 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 5850 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 204 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4950 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1109 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2540 mm |