1998 Chrysler Sebring vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1998 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Chrysler Sebring (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 140 kg more than 1965 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Chrysler Sebring (176 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1998 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Chrysler Sebring | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Triumph |
| Model | Sebring | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1994 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 176 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1660 mm |
