1998 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2004 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2004 Toyota Tundra is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 3,376 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Tundra (190 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1998 Chrysler Sebring. (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1998 Chrysler Sebring. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 470 kg more than 1998 Chrysler Sebring. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Toyota Tundra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Toyota Tundra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Tundra (298 Nm) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Chrysler Sebring. (176 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Chrysler Sebring.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Chrysler Sebring | 2004 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
Model | Sebring | Tundra |
Year Released | 1998 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 3376 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 298 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 9.6:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1920 mm |