1998 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2006 Fiat Croma
To start off, 2006 Fiat Croma is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Chrysler Sebring (140 HP) has 10 more horse power than 2006 Fiat Croma. (130 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 2006 Fiat Croma.
Because 2006 Fiat Croma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Fiat Croma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Fiat Croma has automatic transmission and 1998 Chrysler Sebring has manual transmission. 1998 Chrysler Sebring will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Fiat Croma will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Chrysler Sebring | 2006 Fiat Croma | |
Make | Chrysler | Fiat |
Model | Sebring | Croma |
Year Released | 1998 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 1798 cc |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 130 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1780 mm |