1998 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Chrysler Sebring (140 HP) has 31 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ecosport. (109 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ecosport.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Chrysler Sebring | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | Sebring | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1994 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 109 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1980 mm |
