1998 Chrysler Viper vs. 2000 Holden HRT
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Chrysler Viper. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Chrysler Viper would be higher. At 7,986 cc (10 cylinders), 1998 Chrysler Viper is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1998 Chrysler Viper is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Chrysler Viper. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden HRT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 194 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Chrysler Viper. (621 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Chrysler Viper.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Chrysler Viper | 2000 Holden HRT | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | Viper | HRT |
Year Released | 1998 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7986 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 389 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 621 Nm | 815 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |