1998 Citroen AX vs. 1987 Volvo 240

To start off, 1998 Citroen AX is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Volvo 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Volvo 240 (96 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1998 Citroen AX. (48 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1987 Volvo 240 should accelerate faster than 1998 Citroen AX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Volvo 240 weights approximately 622 kg more than 1998 Citroen AX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1987 Volvo 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1987 Volvo 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Citroen AX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1987 Volvo 240 (157 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Citroen AX. (75 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1987 Volvo 240 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Citroen AX.

Compare all specifications: