1998 Citroen C 15 vs. 1972 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1998 Citroen C 15 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1972 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1998 Citroen C 15. (59 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1998 Citroen C 15. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Citroen C 15 weights approximately 3 kg more than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Citroen C 15. (108 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1972 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Citroen C 15.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Citroen C 15 | 1972 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Citroen | Mazda |
| Model | C 15 | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1761 cc | 1964 cc |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 108 Nm | 133 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 942 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1170 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2210 mm |
