1998 Citroen C 15 vs. 2009 Mazda 3

To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Citroen C 15. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Citroen C 15 would be higher. At 2,260 cc, 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (154 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1998 Citroen C 15. (59 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1998 Citroen C 15. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 605 kg more than 1998 Citroen C 15. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 3 (203 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Citroen C 15. (108 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Citroen C 15.

Compare all specifications:

1998 Citroen C 15 2009 Mazda 3
Make Citroen Mazda
Model C 15 3
Year Released 1998 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1761 cc 2260 cc
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 59 HP 154 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 108 Nm 203 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 4500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 80 mm 87.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88 mm 94 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 23.0:1 10.0:1
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 945 kg 1550 kg
Vehicle Length 4010 mm 4550 mm
Vehicle Width 1650 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1820 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2760 mm 2650 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 47 L 55 L