1998 Citroen C 15 vs. 2010 Audi TT
To start off, 2010 Audi TT is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Citroen C 15. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Citroen C 15 would be higher. At 1,964 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi TT (168 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1998 Citroen C 15. (59 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1998 Citroen C 15.
Because 2010 Audi TT is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Citroen C 15. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Audi TT (350 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 242 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Citroen C 15. (108 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2010 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Citroen C 15.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Citroen C 15 | 2010 Audi TT | |
Make | Citroen | Audi |
Model | C 15 | TT |
Year Released | 1998 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1761 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 108 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4201 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1359 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2469 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 60 L |