1998 Citroen C 15 vs. 2011 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2011 Nissan Micra is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Citroen C 15. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Citroen C 15 would be higher. At 1,761 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Citroen C 15 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Micra (79 HP) has 20 more horse power than 1998 Citroen C 15. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 1998 Citroen C 15.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 108 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Citroen C 15 | 2011 Nissan Micra | |
| Make | Citroen | Nissan |
| Model | C 15 | Micra |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1761 cc | 1200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 79 HP |
| Torque | 108 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1666 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1514 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2449 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 46 L |
