1998 Citroen Saxo vs. 1960 Mini MK I

To start off, 1998 Citroen Saxo is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Mini MK I would be higher. At 1,585 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Citroen Saxo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Citroen Saxo (58 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1960 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Citroen Saxo should accelerate faster than 1960 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Citroen Saxo weights approximately 275 kg more than 1960 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Citroen Saxo (93 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Mini MK I. (60 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1998 Citroen Saxo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Mini MK I.

Compare all specifications:

1998 Citroen Saxo 1960 Mini MK I
Make Citroen Mini
Model Saxo MK I
Year Released 1998 1960
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1585 cc 848 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 58 HP 34 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 93 Nm 60 Nm
Torque RPM 2250 RPM 2900 RPM
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 890 kg 615 kg
Vehicle Length 3730 mm 3060 mm
Vehicle Width 1630 mm 1420 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1360 mm
Wheelbase Size 2550 mm 2040 mm