1998 Citroen Saxo vs. 1983 Dodge Charger
To start off, 1998 Citroen Saxo is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Dodge Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Dodge Charger would be higher. At 1,592 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Dodge Charger (62 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1998 Citroen Saxo. (49 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1998 Citroen Saxo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Dodge Charger weights approximately 245 kg more than 1998 Citroen Saxo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Dodge Charger (117 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Citroen Saxo. (74 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1983 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Citroen Saxo.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Citroen Saxo | 1983 Dodge Charger | |
Make | Citroen | Dodge |
Model | Saxo | Charger |
Year Released | 1998 | 1983 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 954 cc | 1592 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 74 Nm | 117 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 8.4:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 805 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 5220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 80 L |