1998 Citroen Saxo vs. 1996 Rover 200

To start off, 1998 Citroen Saxo is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,589 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Citroen Saxo (117 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1996 Rover 200. (108 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Citroen Saxo should accelerate faster than 1996 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Rover 200 weights approximately 140 kg more than 1998 Citroen Saxo.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Citroen Saxo (145 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Rover 200. (137 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 1998 Citroen Saxo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Rover 200.

Compare all specifications:

1998 Citroen Saxo 1996 Rover 200
Make Citroen Rover
Model Saxo 200
Year Released 1998 1996
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1586 cc 1589 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 117 HP 108 HP
Engine RPM 6600 RPM 6300 RPM
Torque 145 Nm 137 Nm
Torque RPM 5200 RPM 5200 RPM
Engine Bore Size 78.5 mm 75 mm
Engine Stroke Size 82 mm 90 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.8:1 9.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 925 kg 1065 kg
Vehicle Length 3730 mm 3980 mm
Vehicle Width 1630 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2390 mm 2510 mm