1998 Citroen Saxo vs. 2000 Ford ST 460
To start off, 2000 Ford ST 460 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Citroen Saxo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Citroen Saxo would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 401 more horse power than 1998 Citroen Saxo. (59 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 1998 Citroen Saxo.
Because 2000 Ford ST 460 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford ST 460. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Citroen Saxo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford ST 460 (178 Nm) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Citroen Saxo. (87 Nm). This means 2000 Ford ST 460 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Citroen Saxo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Citroen Saxo | 2000 Ford ST 460 | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | Saxo | ST 460 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1122 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 460 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6150 RPM |
| Torque | 87 Nm | 178 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2580 mm |
