1998 Citroen Saxo vs. 2004 Lexus SC
To start off, 2004 Lexus SC is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Citroen Saxo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Citroen Saxo would be higher. At 4,277 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Lexus SC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lexus SC (300 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 251 more horse power than 1998 Citroen Saxo. (49 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lexus SC should accelerate faster than 1998 Citroen Saxo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Lexus SC weights approximately 937 kg more than 1998 Citroen Saxo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Lexus SC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Lexus SC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Citroen Saxo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lexus SC (441 Nm) has 367 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Citroen Saxo. (74 Nm). This means 2004 Lexus SC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Citroen Saxo.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Citroen Saxo | 2004 Lexus SC | |
Make | Citroen | Lexus |
Model | Saxo | SC |
Year Released | 1998 | 2004 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 954 cc | 4277 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 74 Nm | 441 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 70 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 62 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 805 kg | 1742 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 75 L |