1998 Citroen Saxo vs. 2009 Tata Nano
To start off, 2009 Tata Nano is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Citroen Saxo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Citroen Saxo would be higher. At 1,585 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Citroen Saxo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Citroen Saxo (58 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2009 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Citroen Saxo should accelerate faster than 2009 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Citroen Saxo weights approximately 290 kg more than 2009 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Citroen Saxo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Citroen Saxo (93 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1998 Citroen Saxo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Tata Nano.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Citroen Saxo | 2009 Tata Nano | |
Make | Citroen | Tata |
Model | Saxo | Nano |
Year Released | 1998 | 2009 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1585 cc | 624 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 58 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 93 Nm | 48 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 77 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 23.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 158 km/hour | 105 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 3099 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1495 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1652 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2230 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.2 L/100km | 4.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 37 L |