1998 Citroen Saxo vs. 2011 Volvo C30
To start off, 2011 Volvo C30 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Citroen Saxo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Citroen Saxo would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Citroen Saxo (117 HP) has 3 more horse power than 2011 Volvo C30. (114 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Citroen Saxo should accelerate faster than 2011 Volvo C30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo C30 weights approximately 526 kg more than 1998 Citroen Saxo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Volvo C30 (270 Nm) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Citroen Saxo. (145 Nm). This means 2011 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Citroen Saxo.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Citroen Saxo | 2011 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | Saxo | C30 |
Year Released | 1998 | 2011 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 117 HP | 114 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 270 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2639 mm |