1998 Citroen XM vs. 1982 Honda Accord

To start off, 1998 Citroen XM is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Honda Accord. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Honda Accord would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Citroen XM (115 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1982 Honda Accord. (79 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Citroen XM should accelerate faster than 1982 Honda Accord. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Citroen XM weights approximately 320 kg more than 1982 Honda Accord. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Citroen XM (174 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Honda Accord. (126 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1998 Citroen XM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Honda Accord.

Compare all specifications:

1998 Citroen XM 1982 Honda Accord
Make Citroen Honda
Model XM Accord
Year Released 1998 1982
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1998 cc 1602 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 115 HP 79 HP
Engine RPM 5750 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 174 Nm 126 Nm
Torque RPM 4250 RPM 3500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1280 kg 960 kg
Vehicle Length 4720 mm 4260 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1670 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1360 mm
Wheelbase Size 2760 mm 2460 mm