1998 Citroen XM vs. 1994 Lancia Zeta
To start off, 1998 Citroen XM is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Lancia Zeta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Lancia Zeta would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Citroen XM (115 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1994 Lancia Zeta. (89 HP @ 4100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Citroen XM should accelerate faster than 1994 Lancia Zeta.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Lancia Zeta (182 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Citroen XM. (174 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1994 Lancia Zeta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Citroen XM. 1994 Lancia Zeta has automatic transmission and 1998 Citroen XM has manual transmission. 1998 Citroen XM will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1994 Lancia Zeta will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Citroen XM | 1994 Lancia Zeta | |
| Make | Citroen | Lancia |
| Model | XM | Zeta |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1929 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 115 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Torque | 174 Nm | 182 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Top Speed | 193 km/hour | 195 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
