1998 Citroen XM vs. 2005 Ford Explorer
To start off, 2005 Ford Explorer is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Citroen XM would be higher. At 4,014 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Explorer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Explorer (210 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1998 Citroen XM. (115 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Explorer should accelerate faster than 1998 Citroen XM.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Explorer (330 Nm) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Citroen XM. (174 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Explorer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Citroen XM.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Citroen XM | 2005 Ford Explorer | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | XM | Explorer |
Year Released | 1998 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 4014 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 330 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 9.7:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 85 L |