1998 Citroen Xsara vs. 1941 Volvo PV
To start off, 1998 Citroen Xsara is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Volvo PV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Volvo PV would be higher. At 3,668 cc (6 cylinders), 1941 Volvo PV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Citroen Xsara (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1941 Volvo PV. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1941 Volvo PV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Volvo PV weights approximately 410 kg more than 1998 Citroen Xsara.
Because 1941 Volvo PV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1941 Volvo PV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Citroen Xsara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Citroen Xsara | 1941 Volvo PV | |
| Make | Citroen | Volvo |
| Model | Xsara | PV |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1941 |
| Engine Size | 1761 cc | 3668 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1490 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2880 mm |
